Showing posts with label intimate partner abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intimate partner abuse. Show all posts

Friday, February 8, 2013

Doctors urged to screen women for domestic abuse


By Monte Morin, Los Angeles Times
January 21, 20138:02 p.m.
 

Asking standard questions of female patients of childbearing age shows a 'moderate net benefit' and little risk, a federal advisory panel says.

Women of childbearing age should undergo screening for domestic violence and other forms of abuse while visiting their doctor or clinic, according to a recommendation published online Monday by an influential panel of medical experts that advises the federal government.
 
That recommendation, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, marks a significant change from 2004 when the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to support screenings for so-called intimate partner violence, or IPV.
 
Now, citing new evidence, the task force said that screening women for IPV with a list of standard questions showed a "moderate net benefit," while the risks associated with disclosing abuse were small.

"The bottom line is that more research is needed on how primary-care clinicians can effectively screen and protect all populations, including older and vulnerable adults, middle-aged women, men and children from abuse and violence," said Dr. David Grossman, a Seattle pediatrician and task force member.

The guidelines apply only to women aged 14 to 46 who do not show obvious signs of physical or sexual abuse that would otherwise prompt questions from healthcare providers. Though the report acknowledged that women of childbearing age were not the only people who suffered abuse at the hands of former or current intimate partners, evidence was still insufficient to recommend broader screenings, the authors said.
If abuse is confirmed, physicians should provide patients with, or refer them to, intervention services, the panel said. Such services include counseling, home visits, information cards, community service referrals and mentor programs.
 
In a separate draft statement addressing child maltreatment, task force members said there wasn't enough evidence to recommend how clinicians could prevent abuse among children who lacked obvious symptoms.
 
Intimate partner violence includes physical violence, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, stalking and reproductive coercion — intimidation that increases the risk of unplanned pregnancy. The Centers for Disease Control and Preventionestimates that nearly 31% of women and 26% of men have experienced IPV in their lifetimes. Immediate health consequences include injury, death, sexually transmitted diseases, unintended pregnancy, psychological distress and premature births.
 
Screening for domestic violence is recommended by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for women of all ages. Other organizations, such as the American Medical Assn., encourage physicians to inquire about abuse in all patients as part of medical history, but do not recommend a specific screening format or list of questions.
 
Monday's recommendation by the task force could possibly steer organizations toward adopting a more standardized protocol, according to some healthcare providers.
 
"This is very significant," said Eric Ferrero, a Planned Parenthood spokesman who was not involved in the study. "It's just good practice to know a patient's health history, and we have been conducting screenings for a number of years. Hopefully, with this recommendation, it will be done more broadly."
In the case of Planned Parenthood, which treats about 3 million patients in 800 facilities, IPV screenings were sometimes the first time that patients spoke of or even acknowledged abuse, Ferrero said. "We know, at least anecdotally, that this first discussion has led some women to leave an abusive relationship."
 
The task force recommendation was based on a review of dozens of studies and interviews with more than 30,000 people. Screenings were conducted several ways. Some women were questioned face to face by their healthcare provider and others performed self-screenings, answering questions on either a computer or a printed questionnaire.

Monday, February 6, 2012

HEALTHDAY: Ob-Gyns Should Screen for Domestic Abuse: Experts

Intimate partner violence can be psychological or physical, occurs at all levels of society

By Robert Preidt

TUESDAY, Jan. 24 (HealthDay News) -- Obstetricians and gynecologists should screen all patients for intimate partner violence, including during prenatal visits, according to new recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

In addition, ob-gyns should offer patients support, and have referral and resource information on hand to give to patients who are victims of abuse.

Intimate partner violence includes physical injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive isolation, stalking, deprivation, intimidation and reproductive coercion. The goal of these behaviors is to establish control over a partner.

The violence can occur among both heterosexual and same-sex partners and at every level of society, regardless of age, gender, income levels, race, ethnicity, religion or educational background, according to a news release from the college.

About one in four women has been physically and/or sexually assaulted by a current or former partner, and nearly 324,000 pregnant women are abused by their partners each year in the United States, researchers have found.

Intimate partner violence has been linked to poor pregnancy outcomes, including poor weight gain, infection, fetal injury, preterm delivery, low birth weight and stillbirth.

Signs and symptoms that a woman is experiencing violence include physical injuries, chronic headaches, chronic pelvic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, and recurrent vaginal infections. Violence is often linked to depression, anxiety, substance abuse, unintended pregnancy and suicide.

"Women of all ages experience intimate partner violence, but it is most prevalent among reproductive-age women," Dr. Maureen Phipps, chair of the college's Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, said in the news release. "We have a prime opportunity to identify and help women who are being abused by incorporating this screening into our routine office visits with each and every patient."

The recommendations are published in the February issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.

SOURCE: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, news release, Jan. 23, 2012
HealthDay

CDC: National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey

CDC’s National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) is an ongoing, nationally-representative telephone survey that collects detailed information on sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization of adult women and men in the United States. The survey collects data on past-year experiences of violence as well as lifetime experiences of violence. The 2010 survey is the first year of the survey and provides baseline data that will be used to track trends in sexual violence, stalking and intimate partner violence. CDC developed NISVS to better describe and monitor the magnitude of these forms of violence in the United States.

Highlights of 2010 Findings

Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence are widespread in the United States. The findings in this report underscore the heavy toll of this violence, the immediate impacts of victimization, and the lifelong health consequences.

Women are disproportionally affected by sexual violence, intimate partner violence and stalking.
  • 1.3 million women were raped during the year preceding the survey.
  • Nearly 1 in 5 women have been raped in their lifetime while 1 in 71 men have been raped in their lifetime.
  • 1 in 6 women have been stalked during their lifetime. 1 in 19 men have experienced stalking in their lifetime.
  • 1 in 4 women have been the victim of severe physical violence by an intimate partner while 1 in 7 men experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner.
  • 81% of women who experienced rape, stalking or physical violence by an intimate partner reported significant short or long term impacts related to the violence experienced in this relationship such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and injury while 35% of men report such impacts of their experiences.
  • Women who had experienced rape or stalking by any perpetrator or physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime were more likely than women who did not experience these forms of violence to report having asthma, diabetes, and irritable bowel syndrome.
  • Men and women who experienced these forms of violence were more likely to report frequent headaches, chronic pain, difficulty with sleeping, activity limitations, poor physical health and poor mental health than men and women who did not experience these forms of violence.
Female victims of intimate partner violence experienced different patterns of violence than male victims.
  • Female victims experienced multiple forms of these types of violence; male victims most often experienced physical violence.
The majority of this victimization starts early in life.
  • Approximately 80% of female victims experienced their first rape before the age of 25 and almost half experienced the first rape before age 18 (30% between 11-17 years old and 12% at or before the age of 10).
  • About 35% of women who were raped as minors were also raped as adults compared to 14% of women without an early rape history.
  • 28% of male victims of rape were first raped when they were 10 years old or younger.
 Summary
Overall, lifetime and one year estimates for sexual violence, stalking and intimate partner violence were alarmingly high for adult Americans; with IPV alone affecting more than 12 million people each year. Women
are disproportionately impacted. They experienced high rates of severe intimate partner violence, rape and
stalking, and long-term chronic disease and other health impacts such as PTSD symptoms. NISVS also shows that most rape and IPV is first experienced before age 24, highlighting the importance of preventing this violence before it occurs to ensure that all people can live life to their fullest potential.

    HealthDay: Neurologists Should Screen Patients for Abuse: Experts

    People with certain disorders might be more vulnerable to violence, says American Academy of Neurology

    By Robert Preidt
    Wednesday, January 25, 2012

    WEDNESDAY, Jan. 25 (HealthDay News) -- Neurologists should screen their patients for abuse by family members, caregivers or other people, the American Academy of Neurology says in a new position statement.

    Problems to look for include elder, sexual, child, financial and emotional abuse; bullying, cyberbullying and violence.

    Certain neurologic disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease or stroke, may raise the risk for abuse and neglect, the academy said.

    The statement outlines 10 principles for neurologists to use when meeting with patients. These include integrating questions about abuse into a patient's medical history and routinely checking patients for past and ongoing violence.

    The academy is also offering free training to members interested in learning how to deal with domestic violence issues in their communities.

    "Neurologists see patients with neurologic disorders that may make them more susceptible to abuse or neglect. They also see patients with neurologic issues that may be either directly or indirectly related to mistreatment," statement lead author Dr. Elliott Schulman, of Lankenau Medical Center in Wynnewood, Penn., said in an academy news release.

    More than 90 percent of all injuries caused by intimate partner violence occur to the head, face or neck and can result in traumatic brain injury, according to the statement.

    It also noted that people with neurologic disorders such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease may be at increased risk for abuse and neglect.

    "By routinely asking about violence and abuse, the neurologist increases the opportunity for both identifying ongoing abuse and intervening when appropriate," Schulman said. "In addition to further physical and emotional harm, consequences of not asking about abuse might include failure of treatments and, when children are exposed to abuse, perpetuation of the cycle of abuse from generation to generation."

    The statement appears Jan. 25 in the online issue of the journal Neurology.

    SOURCE: American Academy of Neurology, news release, Jan. 18, 2012
    HealthDay

    Friday, September 16, 2011

    Victims of Intimate Partner Violence at Significantly Increased Risk of Psychiatric Disorders

    Source: American Psychiatric Association

    ARLINGTON, Va. (Aug. 1, 2011) — Mental disorders are significantly more common among victims of intimate partner violence than among nonvictims, according to research appearing in the August issue of the American Psychiatric Association’s journal Psychiatric Services.

    Of adults interviewed, about 5 percent reported being victims of intimate partner violence including 5.6 percent of women and 5.8 percent of men. New onset of psychiatric disorders was more than twice as common among victims, 22 percent, compared to nonvictims, 9.7 percent. More than 25,000 adults participated in the study, including 1,600 who reported being victims of intimate partner violence, as part of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    For most of the violent acts, the frequency of the acts directly related to the incidence of a psychiatric disorders—an increased frequency of the violent acts contributed to increased risk of developing a psychiatric disorder. Intimate partner violence was associated with an increased risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, bipolar disorder, panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.

    The study looked at adults who reported being married, recently married, or in a romantic relationship in the past 12 months and looked at minor and severe forms of intimate partner violence. As with previous research, they did not find significant different between genders. Men and women were equally likely to have injuries requiring to medical care, however, women were more likely to be victims of sexual violence.

    The authors conclude, “Intimate partner violence is highly prevalent in the United States, affects both men and women, and is associated with onset of a broad range of psychiatric disorders.” Health care providers have an opportunity to intervene and to lower the risk of psychiatric disorder onset.

    The researchers, led by Mayumi Okuda, M.D., are affiliated with the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, College of Surgeons of Columbia University.

    The American Psychiatric Association is a national medical specialty society whose physician members specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and research of mental illnesses, including substance use disorders. Visit the APA at www.psych.org and www.HealthyMinds.org.

    Friday, August 26, 2011

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Releases Latest Data on Deaths

    “Surveillance for Violent Deaths — National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 States, 2008,” appears in the August 26, 2011 online edition of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries (MMWR). 
     

    Report Highlights:

    The new report compiled data on 16,138 deaths in 2008 from 16 NVDRS states. A majority of these deaths were:

    • Suicides (58.7%)
    • Homicide/legal intervention deaths (26.4%)
    • Deaths of undetermined intent (14.5%)

    NVDRS provides a comprehensive picture by combining once fragmented pieces of information from:

    • Death certificates
    • Coroner/medical examiner reports
    • Toxicology results
    • Law enforcement reports
    • And other reports related to each death


    Data are used to inform prevention efforts by providing a more complete understanding of the circumstances preceding deaths in these 16 states.

    To Learn More:


    ABSTRACT

    HOMICIDE PATTERNS
    "Escalated interpersonal conflicts with an intimate partner, a friend, or another acquaintance remained the primary preceding circumstances for homicide. These circumstances were vastly more common than random acts of violence, hate crimes, or drive by shootings. For incidents with male victims, arguments with an acquaintance other than an intimate partner most often preceded homicide. Homicides with female victims were most often a result of intimate partner violence. Similar findings were provided in previous reports and studies (7--9,21). These findings provide more evidence that homicides are most commonly perpetrated by someone known to the victim, and strategies designed to reduce interpersonal and relationship conflicts might be valuable for prevention efforts.

    Homicide-followed-by-suicide (i.e., homicide-suicide) incidents continued to be rare in 2008. However, they did account for the greatest proportion of violent incidents that involved multiple deaths. Similar to other reports and previous data years, perpetrators of homicide-suicide incidents were mostly white males of mid-late adulthood (i.e., aged 35--54 years) and victims were mostly females who were either current of former intimate partners of the perpetrator (21,23,24). As expected, intimate partner problems were among the most common circumstances preceding these incidents (7--9,21); however, job/financial problems and mental health problems were two to three times more common among perpetrators in 2008 versus those in 2007.  

    PREVENTION OPPORTUNITIES
    NVDRS continues to show that interpersonal conflicts and relationship problems, particularly with an intimate partner, are common circumstances preceding a violent event.

     In addition to demonstrating the need to address the situational stressors highlighted in this report, prevention strategies also need to focus on community level factors. For example, changing cultural and social norms (e.g., attitudes condoning the use of violence as a means of resolving conflict) and addressing the social and economic conditions within communities that often give rise to violence (e.g., inequities with regard to the distribution of and access to resources and opportunities, social isolation and lack of connectedness among persons, families, and communities) might further help prevent violence.

    CONCLUSION
    Accurate, timely, and comprehensive surveillance data can be used to monitor the occurrence of violence-related fatal injuries and assist public health and other authorities in the development, implementation, and evaluation of programs and policies that reduce and prevent violent deaths and injuries at the national, state, and local levels (36,37). Continued development and expansion of NVDRS is critical to the public health and criminal justice communities at the federal, state, and local levels that work to reduce the personal, familial, and societal costs of violence. Further efforts are needed to increase the number of states participating in NVDRS, with the ultimate goal of full national representation, including all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. 

    CIRCUMSTANCES - Circumstances preceding fatal injury, by manner of death --- National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 states, 2008 (ABSTRACTED)

    SUICIDE/UNDETERMINED
    • Intimate partner problem: problems with a current or former intimate partner that appear to have contributed to the suicide.
    • Other legal problem: decedent was facing civil legal problems (e.g., a child custody or civil lawsuit).
    • Perpetrator of interpersonal violence in previous month: decedent perpetrated interpersonal violence (e.g., being sought by police for assault or having been issued a restraining order resulting from recent violence) during the previous month.
    • Victim of interpersonal violence in previous month: decedent was the target of interpersonal violence in the past month.
     HOMICIDE
    • Other argument, abuse, conflict: conflict between decedent and suspect was over something other than money, property, or drugs.
    • Jealousy ("lovers' triangle"): jealousy or distress over an intimate partner's relationship or suspected relationship with another person led to the homicide.
    • Intimate-partner violence--related: homicide is related to conflict between current or former intimate partners; includes the death of actual intimate partners and nonintimate partner decedents killed to cause pain to an intimate partner (e.g., child or parent).
    Key STATS - Suicides
    30.9% - Intimate Partner Problem - 32.2% of Males and 25.9% Females who commit suicide.
    27.9% - Crisis in past or impending 2 weeks - 29% Males and 24% Females
    74.6% - Depression - 74.2% Males and 75.4 Females
    9.3% - Anxiety - 8.4% Males and 11.4% Female
    1.6% - PTSD

    KEY STATS - Homicides
    22.9% Married
    10.2% Spouse/Intimate partner (current or former)
    .8% Other intimate partner involvement
    18.1% Females Age 35-44
    18.7% Males Age 20-24
    53.5% Black, Non-hispanic Males
    50.7% White Females
    52.2% Mudered at home
    18.4% Intimate partner-violence-related - 7.6% Males and 51.6% Females
    24.3% Assault/Homicide

    KEY STATS - Undetermined Death
    11.1% Intimate partner problem 
    14.7% Crisis in past or impending 2 weeks

    To see entire report, please visit the CDC's website.

    Sunday, July 18, 2010

    Mental Health Consequences of Intimate Partner Abuse

    Mindy B Mechanic; Terri L Weaver; Patricia A Resick;
    California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.
    Battered women are exposed to multiple forms of intimate partner abuse. This article explores the independent contributions of physical violence, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and stalking on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression among a sample of 413 severely battered, help-seeking women. The authors test the unique effects of psychological abuse and stalking on mental health outcomes, after controlling for physical violence, injuries, and sexual coercion. Mean scores for the sample fall into the moderate to severe range for PTSD and within the moderate category for depression scores. Hierarchical regressions test the unique effects of stalking and psychological abuse, after controlling for physical violence, injuries, and sexual coercion. Psychological abuse and stalking contribute uniquely to the prediction of PTSD and depression symptoms, even after controlling for the effects of physical violence, injuries, and sexual coercion. Results highlight the importance of examining multiple dimensions of intimate partner abuse.
    PMID: 18535306 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]